Twitter is one of the most simplistic platforms groups can use when discussing about a topic. Since a tweet is limited to 140 characters, it only allows for a discussion relevant to the topic to occur. The character limit can also be a frustration when trying to have a discussion because not all relevant information one wants to post can be done under one tweet. Instead, they would have to tweet multiple times if they go over the 140 character limit. Twitter only allows for simple discussions which in my opinion is a major flaw.
A BlackBoard discussion is similar to a Twitter discussion, without the character limit. BlackBoard provides more technological features to help groups with collaborations. It also encourages users to research and provide reliable sources when having a discussion. A BlackBoard discussion will result in users providing the most refined answers. I believe BlackBoard will encourage the most educated answers.
In-class discussions are the most natural in that participants will use their prior knowledge on a topic to answer. It can also be unreliable because answers are knowledge based rather than research based. In-class discussions encourages participants to speak out and voice their opinions. In-class discussions do create the most natural and engaging environment because it requires the most attention. Discussing about a controversial topic in-class vs. online will always differ. In-class discussion provides a more intimate environment while an online discussion is more of a washed down version.
These three types of discussion methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, but are great tools to communicate with each other. Regardless of which method is used, they all provide a unique method to communicate.
No comments:
Post a Comment